| |
1. |
Very short selection (14% shorter than standard Grand Nain). |
| |
2. |
The DC 52 selection is 11% taller than standard Dwarf Cavendish which is 2.57m (for mean of 2 ratoon cycles). |
| |
3. |
The selection is regarded as a “semi-dwarf” being midway between normal Dwarf Cavendish and Chinese Cavendish in height. |
| |
4. |
Has a very sturdy, thick pseudostem which may not need propping. |
| |
5. |
Productivity is reasonable for a semi-dwarf (higher than Dwarf Cavendish) but bunches cannot compare with Chinese Cavendish or Grand Nain in size. |
| |
6. |
Bunch is more cylindrical than is usual for Dwarf Cavendish, thus bottom hands are bigger. |
| |
7. |
Cycle time about 2 weeks shorter than standard Grand Nain due to the smaller stature of DC 52. |
| |
8. |
A good choice for very windy conditions and for centre pivot irrigation systems. |
| |
9. |
A bit more susceptible to choke throat than Grand Nain during winter flower emergence, although more tolerant than normal Dwarf Cavendish. |
| |
10. |
The selection was made as a compromise between the old Dwarf Cavendish and Chinese Cavendish. However, the yield/ha/annum is below that of Chinese Cav. |
| |
11. |
Trials in the tropics (Costa Rica and Cameroon) showed that DC 52 could not be chosen as a high yielder, but that it had practical advantages related to its height. |
| NOTES: |
• |
Standard Grand Nain and Williams data were obtained from a long term cultivar trial using unimproved sucker planting material at a Government Research Station (Kiepersol), under optimal growth and management conditions. Data are thus not strictly comparable (only indicative). |
| |
|
|
• |
The main characteristics described are extrapolated from several trial sites in local RSA conditions. Results from tropical trials show similar results (shorter plant, lower yields/ha and reduced first grade packout, compared to taller selections). |